Skip to main content

Tools · Privacy · AI governance · Insights

A working library forCanadian privacy.

Movahedi.ca is a working library for Canadian privacy and AI governance. It gives privacy, legal, security, product, and AI teams free tools, plain-language coverage of Law 25 and PIPEDA, and regular practitioner analysis in English and French. Start with your question, then use a tool, check a rule, or read the analysis.

Explore the enforcement tracker,about, services, andoutcomes.

Built for privacy, legal, security, product, and AI teams.

Resource path / 01From question to answer

Follow the question to something you can use.

Privacy and AI governance resource mapA visitor moves from a question to a legal source, a tool, a decision, and supporting evidence.QUESTIONSTART HERESOURCELAW / RULINGTOOLTRY ITDECISIONEXPLAINEDEVIDENCEKEPT CLOSE

Move your pointer across the map. Tools, source material, and analysis stay connected.

Start with your question.Find the tool, rule, or analysis that answers it.

Use the work. Do not start from a blank page.

Choose from 23 hands-on tools for breach response, data mapping, consent, AI risk, explainability, and governance. Each one turns a live question into a file, score, checklist, or decision you can take back to your team.

Map the data before the meeting starts.

The Data Mapping Field Guide helps you build an inventory, test retention choices, trace a data flow, and export the working file. It covers Quebec Law 25 and PIPEDA, and runs in your browser.

Open the field guide
Data Mapping Field GuideInventory · retention · map builder

Bring

  • The systems that hold personal information
  • Purposes, owners, vendors, and retention questions
  • The data flow your team needs to explain

Leave with

  • A structured data inventory
  • A retention timeline you can test
  • An exportable map for the next review

Export it. Open it in the next meeting.

23 toolsAudits, calculators, guides, and games
Law 25 + PIPEDACanadian privacy in working language
AI governanceRisk, controls, bias, and explainability
Regular analysis · EN + FRPractitioner analysis in English and French
333 termsPlain-language privacy and AI governance terms (English, French mappings in progress)

Four routes. Pick the one that matches your question.

You do not need to know which statute, framework, or control comes first. Start with what you are trying to do.

01

Tools

Run a breach clock, audit a cookie banner, map personal information, test AI explanations, or build a governance checklist.

You get: something usable, exportable, or ready to discuss
02

Privacy

Follow Quebec Law 25, PIPEDA, OPC findings, CAI guidance, consent, breach response, retention, and cross-border questions.

You learn: what the source says and what needs attention next
03

AI Governance

Work through AI inventories, risk classification, explainability, bias, human oversight, acceptable use, and monitoring.

You learn: how to move from an AI use case to a review record
04

Insights

Read regular practitioner analysis of current Canadian privacy and AI governance issues, in English and French, with the primary source kept close.

You get: the issue, the source, and the part worth watching

03 / Insights

Practitioner analysis, read closely.

Regular practitioner analysis in English and French. Read the analysis, follow the named source, then use the 333-term glossary when the language gets dense.

Portrait of Mohammad Movahedi

Mohammad Movahedi · Mississauga

Read privacy and AI governance side by side.

Look up the term, open the ruling, test the control, and keep the source close enough to challenge the answer.

Privacy coverage follows consent, access, retention, breach response, vendors, and cross-border data. AI governance coverage follows use-case discovery, risk classification, explainability, bias, human oversight, acceptable use, and monitoring.

Quebec Law 25PIPEDAOPC + CAIAI riskHuman oversightExplainability

Common questions

Not sure where your biggest privacy or AI risk sits?

Book a focused discovery call. We will name your highest-risk gaps, figure out whether you need a project, a part-time senior lead, or just a roadmap, and sketch what good looks like in 90 days.

Responsible AI advisory packages →